Hakkında herşey C# IStructuralEquatable Temel Özellikleri

Wiki Article

The "No" in part 2 of the answer is actually incorrect. Note: Tried editing the answer, but apparently some think that the highest rated answer being incorrect is derece reason enough to approve a correction edit.

Important Some information relates to prerelease product that may be substantially modified before it’s released. Microsoft makes no warranties, express or implied, with respect to the information provided here.

Will feeblemind affect the original creature's body when it was cast on it while it was polymorphed and reverted to its original form afterwards?

Yazımızın yukarıdaki satırlarında da bahsettiğimiz kabil struct C#’ta value type yaratabileceğimiz kuruluşdır.

As an example, it might make sense for two different instances of an Employee class to be considered equal if they both represent the same entity in your system.

Structural equality means that two objects are equal because they have equal values. It differs from reference equality, which indicates that two object references are equal because they reference the same physical object. The IStructuralEquatable interface enables you to implement customized comparisons to check for the structural equality of collection objects.

IStructuralEquatable is quite new and unknown, but I read somewhere that it kişi be used to compare the contents of collections and arrays. Am I wrong, or is my .Kupkuru wrong?

When an implementer overrides the virtual Equals method in a struct, the purpose is to provide a more efficient means of performing the value equality check and optionally to base the comparison on some subset of the struct's field or properties.

Reading through the excellent blog post by Sergey on struct equality performance he mentions that the default implementations are pretty slow and using boxing for each member. Additionally, he mentions that a memory comparison may derece give you the correct results in this super simple example:

Collaborate with us on GitHub The source for this content dirilik be found on GitHub, where you birey also create and review issues and pull requests. For more information, see our contributor guide.

GitHub'da bizimle ortaklaşa iş C# IStructuralEquatable Temel Özellikleri bünyen Bu derunğin kaynağı GitHub'da bulunabilir; burada hassaten sorunları ve çekme isteklerini oluşturup gözden geçirebilirsiniz. Elan şu denli vukuf ciğerin katkıda mevcut kılavuzumuzu inceleyin.

Now that our struct is immutable the actual issue comes up when you need to compare these values. When I started to write the code to fix the bug I just decided that "hey I have the old values, I güç just compare each of them":

There is no need for an equality operator that accepts different types. That should not even compile. So this is a very weak excuse for having a non-generic interface that works with objects.

Specifically, I do not know the exact type of the object. The only assumption I make is that it inherit from IStructuralEquatable.